Organization Behaviour for Ethical and Social-myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theOrganization Behaviour for Ethical,Social and Cultural. Answer: Introduction The primary purpose of this essay is to address merits and demerits of stereotypes in the working place. It also supports to presents the organizational behavior in the working place. Stereotyping is thinking of an individual about any group or individual. This essay also helps to comprehend the methods by which a group and group member in the working place, which could affect the performance of the organization. It critically analysis theories of organizational behavior as it would support to for manage workplace issues. It also demonstrates the factors that could affect the organizational behaviors like ethical, social, and cultural. Meaning and concept of stereotype According to Stewart and Shamdasani (2014), stereotyping is the perception of an individual towards the behavior of a group. There are certain factors that could create the probability of stereotyping in the working place like culture, gender, age, race, ethnicity, and religion. The organization promotes non-discriminatory workplace by creating openness and individual difference acceptance in the working place to prevent the common negative belongingness. In opposition to this, Dolan (2014) examined that stereotyping is the signature technique of mentally organize a high range of information. It facilitates the organization to easily understand, predict, and organization situation in an organized way. There is a possibility to avoid unexpected data about each group member. It could also support to predict the behavior of the individual. Stereotype enables the organization to decline their stress and anxiety and increase self-esteem. It could make enable an individual to make their own norms towards nay inferiors and abnormal group. Stereotyping demonstrates that an individual has all the traits and capabilities of those group members have. Stereotype shows the social segment that is the cause of prejudice attitudes. Stereotypes offer fundamental functions for perceivers by offering the explanations for behaviors of others. It could be effective for improving the motivation level of perceivers. In support of this, Prause and Mujtaba (2015) stated that stereotypes could create many issues at the working place like abuse and mistreatment, lower level of morale, bad working relationship, and legal tension. It could negatively impact on the performance of the organization. If an organization is following stereotype then it could create the possibilities of abuse and mistreatment in the working place. It could negatively impact on the organizational image in the marketplace, which would decline performance of the company. Wilson (2017)argued that a primary issue of stereotyping is that it could be caused by low morale for an individual and group, which could directly influence organizational performance. Workforces who continue criticize and get a negative comment from another employee at the working place. It will decline motivation level of employees and interest towards their job as it would decline the productivity of the employee. Apart from this, it is also found that stereotyping could create the bad working relationship at the working place. If an organization has to stereotype but they believe in the teamwork to get higher success then it could create the major issue for obtaining a positive result. The workforce who is believed on serotypes rather than putting their efforts in the success of groups consequently it could create the possibilities of group failure. In support of this, Harris et al. (2014) illustrated that stereotypes in the working place could create the legal tension. If an individual is affected by discriminatory behaviors then they will sue that employee and group. Hence, it can be said that legal issue could negative image in the workplace. Theories of organization behavior According to Pinder (2014), organization theory support to evaluate the working situation of an organization that is occurred in the organization. There are certain organizational theories that are used by the organization to eliminate stenotypes and improve their performance like behavioral structures, classical structures, and contingency structures. The classical theory is used to follow the hierarchical structure in the working place that enables the company to operate systematically by interlink each employee with the diverse section. Through this strategy, employee communicates to the top management about their compliance and work. It could be supportive to eliminate the stereotypes from the organization. Through this method, management diversifies different sectors for solving issues effectively. It would also support to improve the efficiency of the company in limited time and cost. In opposition to this, Boddy, (2014) examined that contingency theory facilitates the organization to develop their working culture without any formal structure. The adaptation of working culture could be complex for the organization if it is made by the less experienced and knowledgeable manager. The primary advantage of structure workplace is that it facilitates the organization to address the specific needs of consumers. This theory considers both organization situation and manager personality due to making an effective workplace and obtains a positive outcome. Through this theory, organization and management will be capable to eliminate the stereotype from the working place. Pfeffer (2015) opined that behavioral approach could facilitate the organization to analyze the attitude and behavior of the workforce to lead them appropriately. This approach facilitates the organization to decline the negative effects of stereotypes and obtain a feasible outcome. This method facilitates the organization should discover attitude of the employee towards their work. Through this approach, the organization will be capable to develop an effective decision in the context of organizational aim and objectives, which will be imperative for accomplishing existence firm performance. Organizational issues related to the social, cultural, and ethical at the working place In oppose of this, Jung and Yoon, (2015) illustrated that there are three factors that could be caused of serotyping at the working place. It would negatively impact on the organizational performance. The culture is determined as the set of norms for people. Culture could demonstrate the behavior that is acceptable and not in the society. The organizational culture demonstrates company lifestyle. There are different components like working methods, belief, past record, organizational ethics, dress code, customer service quality, social engagement, working atmosphere, and teamwork. Moreover, it would directly influence the attitude of employees and negative impact on the organizational performance. In support of this, Shafritz et al. (2015) stated that ethics is also imperative for making a good atmosphere at the working place by conduct an appropriate code of conduct. It is complicated for an organization to manage the behavior of workforces if they follow their own ethical norms. Different ethical norms of the workforce could create difficulty for the company due to the difference between the workforce and organization of ethical norms. It would create the possibilities of an ethical problem in the organization. There are certain components which could be caused of the ethical issue at the working place such as delay to offer provident fund, sexual harassment, favoritism, and termination. Nonaka et al. (2014) explained that social problem could direct impact on workforce success in the organization. There are certain factors that create the possibility of social issues such as sexism, dependence, drug and alcohol, domestic violence, racism, and poverty. In addition, it is also found that such factors could demotivate workforce and decline their job satisfaction level by creating the negative attitude among the employees. Moreover, the social factor could create possibilities of serotyping at the working place. Strategies for improving organizational behavior at the working place In support of this, Manning (2017) stated that organization should use many strategies with respect to overcoming the ethical challenges from the organization like law identification, determine expectation, train employees, and be fair. It could support organization to create the best atmosphere in the working place. Consequently, ethical strategies could also improve existing situation of the company. The organization should use training and development method to aware employee code of conduct at the working place. It will be effective for obtaining a favorable result. On the other side, Nonaka et al. (2014) stated that cultural differences could influence organization performance but at the same time, there are many strategies that could eliminate cultural issues and obtain a reliable outcome. These strategies are acknowledged the difference between personal preference and business need, directly communicate with employees, and understand different culture value. The organization should critically understand the different culture and make a positive relationship with the employee by giving the value to their culture. Besides this, the organization should directly communicate with employees and mitigate difference related to thoughts and norms. It will be imperative to developing a reliable relation between organization and employees. In contrast to this, Jung and Yoon (2015) explained that the social issues could decline performance of organization hence the organization should use the CSR activity to eliminate the social issue form the organization. The CSR activity enables the organization to contribute in the social welfare. It will help to make a unique image in employees mind. It positively motivates the employee to perform better in the working place. As a result, the company will be capable to get a reliable result. Through this strategy, the organization would be capable to attract a large number of consumers in the least time and cost. Hence, it can be said that the CSR activity also supports the company to develop a unique image in the consumer mind. Conclusion From the above discussion, it can be concluded that each employee has a different code of conduct at the working place that could directly impact on the performance of the organization. It can also be summarized that there are many factors that could affect organizational behavior like structure, procedure, the process of organization. The management efficiency and interactions between employees could also affect organizational behavior. Moreover, it can also be addressed that there are three major factors that could directly impact on the organizational behavior. It is also found that organization should use for improving the organizational behavior at the working place. These strategies could support to motivate the employee to conduct ethical behavior at the working place. It could also aid to obtain a competitive benefit. Reference Boddy, C. R. (2014) Corporate psychopaths, conflict, employee affective well-being and counterproductive work behavior, Journal of Business Ethics,121(1), pp.107-121. Dolan, K. (2014) Gender stereotypes, candidate evaluations, and voting for women candidates: what really matters?,Political Research Quarterly,67(1), 96-107. Harris, J. R., Hannon, P. A., Beresford, S. A., Linnan, L. A., and McLellan, D. L. (2014) Health promotion in smaller workplaces in the United States, Annual review of public health,35, pp. 327-342. Jung, H. S., and Yoon, H. H. (2015) The impact of employees positive psychological capital on job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors in the hotel, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,27(6), pp. 1135-1156. Manning, K. (2017) Organizational theory in higher education. UK: Routledge. Nonaka, I., Kodama, M., Hirose, A., and Kohlbacher, F. (2014) Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformationA new paradigm for organizational theory, European Management Journal,32(1), pp. 137-146. Pfeffer, J. (2015)Leadership BS: Fixing workplaces and careers one truth at a time. USA: HarperCollins. Pinder, C. C. (2014) Work motivation in organizational behavior. USA: Psychology Press. Prause, D., and Mujtaba, B. G. (2015) Conflict management practices for diverse workplaces, Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,6(3), P. 13. Shafritz, J. M., Ott, J. S., and Jang, Y. S. (2015)Classics of organization theory. USA: Cengage Learning. Stewart, D. W., and Shamdasani, P. N. (2014) Focus groups: Theory and practice(Vol. 20). UK: Sage publications. Wilson, F. M. (2017)Organizational behavior and gender. UK: Routledge.